PROUD OF THE PAST, PLANS FOR THE FUTURE
Blood Tranfusion Reactions
Catherisation procedure
Disinfection and Sterilization
flatus tube insertion
Gallstone disease
Prevention of Surgical site infections
Resistant to antibiotics
Injection
Hand Hygiene
Ryles tube insertion
Single incision Laproscopic cholecystectomy
Single trocer STILS appendectomy
Single trocer STILS hysterectomy
temperatture
Bio safety guidlines
Role of Paramedics
Prevention of surgical siteinfections in the operation theatre
SILS

DR.PRITESH NAIK  (LAPAROSCOPIC GYNECOLOGIST)
•POORNIMA HOSPITAL
• AASHISH NURSING HOME
•SUVARNA HOSPITAL
•KARUNA HOSPITAL
DR.AASHISH MODY(LAPAROSCOPIC SURGEON)
•AASHISH NURSING HOME
•SUVARNA HOSPITAL

HISTORY OF SILS

•SILS was described as early as 1992 by Pelosi who performed the first single puncture  Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.
•In 1997 Navarra et. Al. performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy via 2 trans umbilical trocars and 3 trans abdominal gall bladder stay sutures.
•Refinement of technique and equipment has recently brought SILS into the main stream.

The Acronyms

•Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery(SILS)
•Laparo endoscopic single site surgery(LESS)
•Single Port Access Surgery(SPA)
•One Port Umbilicus Surgery(OPUS)
•Natural Orifice Trans umbilical Surgery(NOTUS)

Instruments and Equipments
•Ports
•Graspers
•Telescopes

Roticulators

Telescopes

•A 5mm high definition 30 degree wide angle full screen scope is ideal.
•Variable angle telescopes(0 to 120 degrees)
•Light produced by super bright led’s at the end of the scope.
•Light cable parallel to camera cable to reduce extra abdominal clashing.
•Telescopes with flexible angled tips.
  
    Latest Equipments
  
  

Surgical team

•Advanced Laparoscopic Team well versed with traditional laparoscopy.
•Accurate co ordination between surgeon and camera holder {constant team}
•Limited range of movement and clashing of instruments.—PATIENCE
•Counter intuitive movements.
•Hypo-tensive anaesthesia with good muscle relaxation.

Commonly performed procedures
•Cholecystectomy
•Appendicectomy
•Hysterectomy
•Salpingo-ophorectomy
•Diagnostic laparoscopy with biopsy
Urology and bariatric procedures

TECHNIQUE
•2-2.5 cm incision in the umbilicus.
•Stay sutures taken on the sheath.
•SILS port held with introducer and thrust into the peritoneal cavity.
•5 mm cannulaes introduced into the port and insufflation started.
•Surgery carried out with routine straight laparoscopic instruments and roticulators.
•Sheath closed with non absorbable 1-0 prolene stitches and subcuticular Monocryl to skin.



Advantages and Limitations
•PROPOSED ADVANTAGES
•Improved cosmesis
•Decreased post-operative pain
•Early return to activity
•KNOWN LIMITATIONS
•Steep learning curve
•Cost of equipment
•? Long term complication of incisional hernia.
•Difficult in acute and inflammed organs.

INSERTION OF PORT


SILS   APPENDICECTOMY


SILS   HYSTERECTOMY


SILS   CHOLECYSTECTOMY


CLOSURE OF INCISION


Discussion
  
•Any other advantage besides cosmeses??
•Cost of equipment
•Learning curve
•Safety Profile

Future of SILS
•Will depend on the following
1.Equipment cost
2.Social Acceptance
3.Surgeon skill
4.Training programmes
5.Instrument innovations
6.Professional enthusiasm
7.Mediclaim re-imbursements

OLD CONCEPT:
DO OR DIE

NEW CONCEPT:
DO IT BEFORE YOU DIE

LATEST CONCEPT:
DON’T DIE UNTIL YOU DO IT

Meanwhile The Future Is Here-SILS
Lets keep it this way